Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875235›Full record

ArticleJournal of texture studies2026

Powder Handling and Frozen Texture of a Reconstitutable Strawberry-Oat Sorbet Premix After Sucrose Replacement.

Caroline Dos Santos Lima, Suzana Caetano da Silva Lannes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of texture studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline Dos Santos LimaDepartment of Biochemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6860-8317
Suzana Caetano da Silva LannesDepartment of Biochemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-7376

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dry sorbet premix must remain manageable as a powder and still develop an appropriate structure after reconstitution and freezing. This study compared a sucrose-containing control with a strawberry-oat premix in which sucrose was replaced by maltodextrin, inulin, and a commercial high-intensity sweetener blend. Three independently prepared batches were evaluated in the dry state and after reconstitution and dynamic freezing. The sucrose-replaced powder had a higher angle of repose (44° vs. 39°) and a lower compaction force (2.65 vs. 7.65 N); both powders wetted in approximately 4 s. It also contained modestly more total dietary fiber (4.76% vs. 4.27%), whereas the reported protein and carbohydrate-by-difference estimates did not differ statistically. The prepared sucrose-replaced sorbet required a higher back-extrusion force (6.50 vs. 4.25 N), retained a similar overrun (approximately 50%), and showed less drainage in the available melting profile. The composition and texture results were considered together, but no correlation coefficient was calculated because only two formulations were studied and replicate-level rheology and melting series were unavailable. Replacing sucrose therefore created a powder-texture trade-off; the findings do not establish nutritional superiority or isolate individual ingredient effects.

Indexed as

Food HandlingFragariaSucroseDietary FiberFreezingInulinPolysaccharidesPowdersRheologySweetening AgentsDietary FiberInulinmaltodextrinPolysaccharidesPowdersSucroseSweetening Agentsback extrusionfrozen dessertinulinmaltodextrinmelting behaviorpowder flowability

Identifiers

PMID42875235
PMCPMC13668734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.