ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology2026
Emotional meanings of clinical practice with head and neck cancer patients: a qualitative study with Brazilian professionals.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo interpret emotional meanings attributed by healthcare professionals to the clinical management of patients with head and neck cancer, in a university-specialised outpatient service at a public general hospital.
methodA qualitative study was carried out using semi-directed interviews with open-ended questions in-depth. The sample was closed by the saturation strategy. Data treatment was conducted by Clinical-Qualitative Content Analysis technique under theoretical framework of psychodynamic concepts from Medical Psychology, and validation by peers from a research group.
resultsTen clinical professionals were interviewed: six nurses and four physicians. From the analysis of the interviews, three categories are constructed for this article: (1) An instituted stigmatization; (2) Wide-open reality; (3) Naturalization without trivialization. The aggressiveness of these tumours, the association with harmful lifestyle habits, and the great concern of family members call for clinical-psychological management to mitigate emotional distress, to handle possible guilt, and prevent any burnout, improving a better adherence to treatment and harmonious interpersonal relationships.
conclusionThe stigma is a symbolic entity that takes distress for the clinicians but also seems to highlight a higher level of awareness and reflection. This awareness can be a starting point for the development of healthier strategies for emotional coping, contributing to a more balanced work and personal harmonic relationship of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.