ArticlePoultry science2026
Evaluating the role of vaccination and oocyst management in modulating immune responses of Eimeria-challenged turkey poults.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effects of Eimeria vaccination and amprolium treatment on growth performance, fecal oocyst shedding, and immune response in tom poults challenged with mixed Eimeria species. Two experiments were completed; experiment 1 evaluated the effect of vaccine and amprolium (A) supplementation on OPG cycling. Poults were assigned to five groups: (a) non-vaccinated, non-inoculated (NVNI), (b) low dose (L), (c) low dose with A (LA), (d) high dose (H), and (e) high dose with A (HA). On d1, 40% of poults in the L & LA groups were vaccinated with 100 oocysts/poult of mixed Eimeria species, while 70% in the H & HA group were vaccinated with 500 oocysts/poult. Experiment 2 involved poults randomly assigned to three groups: (a) non -vaccinated (NV), (b) vaccinated (V), and (c) vaccinated plus A (VA). In the V and VA groups, 40% of poults received 100 oocysts/poult containing mixed Eimeria species on d1, while VA received amprolium from d8 to d12. On d21, V and VA were challenged with 25,000 oocysts/poult of Eimeria. Fecal oocyst shedding was monitored from d6 to d28 and lesion scores on d28. Immune responses were assessed by mRNA expression analysis in the ceca and cecal tonsils, and immune cell profiling in the cecal tonsils. L had the highest oocyst shedding, followed by H. In both experiments, lesion scores were minimal and fecal oocyst shedding was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the treatment groups receiving brief amprolium. Immune modulation was most pronounced in the VA group, showing that low oocyst cycling can still induce an immune response in turkeys. Overall, combining vaccination with amprolium improved performance, reduced oocyst shedding, and mitigated intestinal damage while modulating the immune response, thereby offering an effective strategy for managing coccidiosis vaccine response in poultry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.