Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42874230›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Evaluating the role of vaccination and oocyst management in modulating immune responses of Eimeria-challenged turkey poults.

Demilade I Ibiwoye, Philip Yeboah, Thaciane A Lorenzo, Yabaiz Tahir, Tracy Omasanuwa, Carissa Gaghan, Shelly Nolin, Raveendra Kulkarni, Lisa Bielke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Demilade I IbiwoyePrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Philip YeboahPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Thaciane A LorenzoPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Yabaiz TahirPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Tracy OmasanuwaPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Carissa GaghanDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Shelly NolinPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Raveendra KulkarniDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Lisa BielkePrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States. Electronic address: lbielke@ncsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effects of Eimeria vaccination and amprolium treatment on growth performance, fecal oocyst shedding, and immune response in tom poults challenged with mixed Eimeria species. Two experiments were completed; experiment 1 evaluated the effect of vaccine and amprolium (A) supplementation on OPG cycling. Poults were assigned to five groups: (a) non-vaccinated, non-inoculated (NVNI), (b) low dose (L), (c) low dose with A (LA), (d) high dose (H), and (e) high dose with A (HA). On d1, 40% of poults in the L & LA groups were vaccinated with 100 oocysts/poult of mixed Eimeria species, while 70% in the H & HA group were vaccinated with 500 oocysts/poult. Experiment 2 involved poults randomly assigned to three groups: (a) non -vaccinated (NV), (b) vaccinated (V), and (c) vaccinated plus A (VA). In the V and VA groups, 40% of poults received 100 oocysts/poult containing mixed Eimeria species on d1, while VA received amprolium from d8 to d12. On d21, V and VA were challenged with 25,000 oocysts/poult of Eimeria. Fecal oocyst shedding was monitored from d6 to d28 and lesion scores on d28. Immune responses were assessed by mRNA expression analysis in the ceca and cecal tonsils, and immune cell profiling in the cecal tonsils. L had the highest oocyst shedding, followed by H. In both experiments, lesion scores were minimal and fecal oocyst shedding was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the treatment groups receiving brief amprolium. Immune modulation was most pronounced in the VA group, showing that low oocyst cycling can still induce an immune response in turkeys. Overall, combining vaccination with amprolium improved performance, reduced oocyst shedding, and mitigated intestinal damage while modulating the immune response, thereby offering an effective strategy for managing coccidiosis vaccine response in poultry.

Indexed as

AmproliumCoccidiosisEimeriaImmune responseOocyst sheddingTurkey poults

Identifiers

PMID42874230
PMCPMC13685981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.