ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
Shared Governance for Effective Clinical Education in Medical Radiation Science: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical radiation science (MRS) education operates within a rapidly evolving healthcare environment characterised by technological advancement, workforce pressures, and increasing regulatory oversight. Effective governance structures are therefore required to ensure that educational programs remain clinically relevant, compliant with accreditation standards, and responsive to students' wellbeing and patient safety imperatives. This review examines the role of shared governance in facilitating institutional effectiveness, regulatory alignment, and sustainable workforce and clinical education. Literature addressing governance theory, MRS education, clinical supervision, accreditation standards, and professional regulation was prioritised in this review. Twenty-four sources were included and organised across three areas: clinical education and workforce sustainability; professional and regulatory standards; and shared-governance theory. The literature rarely used the term 'shared governance' explicitly in relation to MRS education. Nevertheless, it consistently described distributed responsibilities, interdependence between universities and clinical services, and the need for stakeholder participation in curriculum review, placement planning, assessment, quality assurance and regulatory alignment. Unique vulnerabilities of medical radiation practice, such as rapid technological advancement and global workforce shortages, necessitate agile and inclusive governance structure, especially in settings without clearly outlined governance framework. The review proposes a tri-integrated model linking academic, clinical, and professional/regulatory governance, with students participating across all three domains. This model offers a practical basis for clarifying roles, improving university-health service coordination, supporting sustainable clinical placements, and maintaining educational quality and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.