Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42874125›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2026

Shared Governance for Effective Clinical Education in Medical Radiation Science: A Narrative Review.

Jacob Leonard Ago, Bismark Ofori-Manteaw, Minh Chau, Theophilus N Akudjedu, Yobelli Jimenez, Elio Arruzza, Kelly Bentley-Spuur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacob Leonard AgoFaculty of Science & Health, School of Dentistry & Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1206-4442
Bismark Ofori-ManteawTeaching Innovation in Radiography Group, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-0210
Minh ChauTeaching Innovation in Radiography Group, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-3437
Theophilus N AkudjeduFaculty of Health, Environment & Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Imaging & Visualisation, School of Allied Health & Exercise Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-6897
Yobelli JimenezTeaching Innovation in Radiography Group, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5036-3967
Elio ArruzzaTeaching Innovation in Radiography Group, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7328-6677
Kelly Bentley-SpuurTeaching Innovation in Radiography Group, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0285-9962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical radiation science (MRS) education operates within a rapidly evolving healthcare environment characterised by technological advancement, workforce pressures, and increasing regulatory oversight. Effective governance structures are therefore required to ensure that educational programs remain clinically relevant, compliant with accreditation standards, and responsive to students' wellbeing and patient safety imperatives. This review examines the role of shared governance in facilitating institutional effectiveness, regulatory alignment, and sustainable workforce and clinical education. Literature addressing governance theory, MRS education, clinical supervision, accreditation standards, and professional regulation was prioritised in this review. Twenty-four sources were included and organised across three areas: clinical education and workforce sustainability; professional and regulatory standards; and shared-governance theory. The literature rarely used the term 'shared governance' explicitly in relation to MRS education. Nevertheless, it consistently described distributed responsibilities, interdependence between universities and clinical services, and the need for stakeholder participation in curriculum review, placement planning, assessment, quality assurance and regulatory alignment. Unique vulnerabilities of medical radiation practice, such as rapid technological advancement and global workforce shortages, necessitate agile and inclusive governance structure, especially in settings without clearly outlined governance framework. The review proposes a tri-integrated model linking academic, clinical, and professional/regulatory governance, with students participating across all three domains. This model offers a practical basis for clarifying roles, improving university-health service coordination, supporting sustainable clinical placements, and maintaining educational quality and patient safety.

Indexed as

institutional effectivenessmedical radiation science educationregulatory accountabilityshared governance

Identifiers

PMID42874125
PMCPMC13668328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.