ArticleScience advances2026
Rapid coral bleaching recovery via symbiont transfer from healthy corals.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral bleaching, the temperature-induced loss of dinoflagellate symbionts, is a major driver of global coral reef decline. Although corals can regain symbionts through repopulation of residual symbionts or via environmental acquisition, these processes are often too slow to prevent coral mortality. Mechanisms that enable rapid and effective symbiont reintroduction leading to full recovery remain largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate coral bleaching recovery through contact-mediated transfer of symbionts from healthy corals using small coral fragments. We show that symbiont transfer is rapid, occurring over days to weeks, and highly efficient, with only brief physical contact with healthy corals required. A single week of contact, and in some cases as few as 3 days, provides sufficient symbionts to initiate sustained and full self-recovery. By 1 week, symbiont population doubling time is approximately 4 days, up to an order of magnitude faster than most recovery times for corals in the field. We identify tissue fusion as the mechanism enabling directional symbiont transfer from healthy to bleached coral tissue. As a result, contact-dependent recovery is restricted to corals of the same genet, whereas heterologous genet pairings trigger antagonistic interactions. However, symbiont transfer via polyp uptake occurs immediately upon contact in both same-genet and mixed-genet pairings, revealing an additional, slower pathway for symbiont transfer that is insufficient on its own to support colony recovery. Collectively, these findings reveal a previously unrecognized natural process for efficiently reintroducing symbionts to bleached corals, providing a foundation for research into potential recovery interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.