Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873857›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

A fast and frugal Gaussian boson sampling emulator.

Tom Dodd, Javier Martínez-Cifuentes, Oliver Thomson Brown, Nicolás Quesada, Raúl García-Patrón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom DoddSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.
Javier Martínez-CifuentesDépartement de génie physique, École polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-5587
Oliver Thomson BrownEPCC, University of Edinburgh, 47 Potterow, Edinburgh EH8 9BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5193-8635
Nicolás QuesadaDépartement de génie physique, École polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-1688
Raúl García-PatrónSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-433X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical algorithms have successfully reproduced expectation values of observables for certain quantum circuits using off-the-shelf computing resources; however, matching the performance of the most advanced quantum devices on sampling problems typically incurs extreme memory and computational costs, restricting such simulations to only a handful of supercomputers worldwide. In this work, we demonstrate a classical simulation outperforming Gaussian boson sampling experiments of 100 modes on established benchmark tests using a single central processing unit (CPU) or graphics processing unit (GPU). Being embarrassingly parallelizable, a small number of CPUs or GPUs allows us to match previous sampling rates that required more than 100 GPUs. We believe that algorithmic and implementation improvements have the potential to generalize our tools to photocounting and pseudo-photon number-resolving scenarios and larger system sizes. Last, most of the innovations in our tools remain valid for generic probability distributions over binary variables, rendering them potentially applicable to the simulation of qubit-based sampling problems and creating classical surrogates for classical-quantum algorithms.

Identifiers

PMID42873857
PMCPMC13665930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.