ArticleScience advances2026
A fast and frugal Gaussian boson sampling emulator.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A fast and frugal Gaussian boson sampling emulator.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical algorithms have successfully reproduced expectation values of observables for certain quantum circuits using off-the-shelf computing resources; however, matching the performance of the most advanced quantum devices on sampling problems typically incurs extreme memory and computational costs, restricting such simulations to only a handful of supercomputers worldwide. In this work, we demonstrate a classical simulation outperforming Gaussian boson sampling experiments of 100 modes on established benchmark tests using a single central processing unit (CPU) or graphics processing unit (GPU). Being embarrassingly parallelizable, a small number of CPUs or GPUs allows us to match previous sampling rates that required more than 100 GPUs. We believe that algorithmic and implementation improvements have the potential to generalize our tools to photocounting and pseudo-photon number-resolving scenarios and larger system sizes. Last, most of the innovations in our tools remain valid for generic probability distributions over binary variables, rendering them potentially applicable to the simulation of qubit-based sampling problems and creating classical surrogates for classical-quantum algorithms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.