ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
How compartmentalization and proliferation shape the splenic T cell repertoire during an immune response to a complex antigen in mice.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adaptive immune system recognizes billions of unique antigens using highly variable T cell receptors (TCRs). To what extent TCR features shape the spatial distribution of the TCR repertoire (TCR-R) within lymphoid organs remains unclear. Here, we compared the TCR-R composition in T cell zones (TCZ), B cell zones (BCZ), and germinal centers (GC) of the spleen by analyzing the complementarity-determining region 3 of the beta chain (CDR3β) in microdissected splenic compartments from naïve and immunized mice. While we found substantial differences in TCR-R composition between these compartments, these differences largely disappeared once the effects of compartment size and proliferation were accounted for: During steady state, the few T cells found in BCZs strongly resemble random subsets of those found in TCZs. After immunization, expanded clones started appearing in the TCZ at day 3 and later shifted to the BCZ. GCs harbored even further expanded clones that were grouped into clusters with high sequence similarity. TCR-R differences during the immune response were well explained by a Galton-Watson model of T cell proliferation, suggesting that this could be the central factor shaping the observed TCR-R differences. Similarly, while TCR length and closeness to germline initially showed more pronounced differences between the compartments, our models of random distribution and proliferation explained these differences almost entirely. Hence, our findings suggest that splenic TCR-Rs are shaped predominantly by compartment size and proliferation rates rather than TCR sequence features. This would imply that quantitative assessment of TCR-R dynamics across heterogeneous spatial compartments during an immune response is only possible when these effects are explicitly accounted for.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.