ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Co-developing Georgia's National Digital Health Strategy through a multistakeholder convergence workshop: An implementation case study from the WHO European Region.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National digital health strategies (DHS) are widely recognized as essential for advancing universal health coverage. However, published evidence on operational, multi-stakeholder approaches to co-development-particularly beyond the Asian and African settings where convergence methodology has previously been applied-remains limited. This study details the application of a convergence-based methodology to validate and refine the draft National DHS of Georgia, an upper-middle-income country, aligning it with European Union frameworks. An implementation case study was conducted in Georgia from June to September 2025. Central to this was the Multistakeholder Convergence Workshop, adapted from the Asian Development Bank Digital Health Convergence Meeting Toolkit and a four-phase blueprint methodology. Forty-seven participants from diverse sectors (public, private, academia, and development partners) collaborated in five thematic working groups. They reviewed the draft DHS, generating recommendations that were synthesized against the seven WHO-ITU eHealth strategy building blocks using hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis by two independent coders with third-party arbitration. The revised strategy comprises six strategic goals and 38 priority activities. Key technical recommendations included adopting a federated data governance model, utilizing the existing national identification number instead of a separate Health ID, and establishing a national Health Information Exchange. The strategy endorses FHIR for data exchange, LOINC for laboratory data, and the WHO-FIC (including ICD-11) complemented by SNOMED CT. Governance recommendations emphasized enacting a stand-alone Digital Health Act, forming a dedicated Digital Health Unit within the MoIDPLHSA, integrating digital health into professional education, and extending the strategy horizon to 2030 with a mid-2026 review checkpoint. Structured convergence methodologies, initially developed for Asian settings, can be effectively adapted for upper-middle-income WHO European Region countries pursuing European Health Data Space alignment. This approach produced technically specific outputs, reinforced national ownership, and supported Georgia's transition toward implementation, offering a highly transferable framework for similar contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.