ArticlePloS one2026
An operational key performance indicator framework and reference data from a multi-room pencil beam scanning proton therapy center.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMulti-room proton therapy centers face unique operational challenges related to shared beam delivery systems, extended treatment hours, and high clinical complexity. This study presents a structured framework of key performance indicators (KPIs) and reports longitudinal single-institution operational reference data from a multi-room proton therapy center to support operational assessment and continuous quality improvement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Operational KPIs were retrospectively evaluated for calendar year 2024 at a three-room proton therapy center utilizing pencil beam scanning. KPIs were categorized into three areas: beam performance, treatment planning and pre-treatment workflow, and treatment room operations. Beam performance metrics included site- and room-specific uptime and beam pauses. Treatment planning metrics quantified CT simulation-to-patient scheduling timelines with attribution to physician, dosimetry, and physics components. Treatment room operations metrics included appointment variance, slot utilization, and waiting-for-beam (WFB) time. Data were collected automatically using a commercial analytics platform integrating radio-frequency identification tracking and oncology information system. Metrics were analyzed longitudinally and stratified by treatment room, disease site, and workflow component.
resultsFor calendar year 2024, aggregate site uptime was 95.3%, weighted according to clinical operating time across the three treatment rooms; individual room uptimes ranged from 91.8% to 97.2%. Beam pauses were frequent but brief, resulting in 2,238 minutes of cumulative lost treatment time across 2024, equivalent to approximately 0.5% of total clinical operating time. Annual mean treatment planning time was 8.5 business days, with physician-related activities contributing the greatest variability across disease sites. Monthly average appointment variance ranged from 5 to 11 minutes, with most treatments initiated within 10 minutes of scheduled time. Across 2024, slot utilization was stable, with 73% of fractions completed within scheduled slots. Mean overrun and underrun durations were modest, although P90 overrun durations exceeded 10 minutes throughout the year. Mean WFB times were low and consistent, ranging from 1.5 to 2.3 minutes.
conclusionsThis study presents a practical KPI framework and a single-institution operational reference data for multi-room proton therapy center. These metrics may support longitudinal monitoring, identification of workflow inefficiencies, data-driven decision-making, and future multi-institutional benchmarking efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.