Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Brain tumor segmentation using a combination of graph cut and optimized U-Net with genetic algorithm: An efficient hybrid framework for enhanced medical image analysis.

Reem M Mostafa, Emad Mabrouk, Mohamed Saed Salim, Ahmed Ayman, Hamdy Z Zidan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reem M MostafaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Asyut, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-0291
Emad MabroukCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila, Kuwait.
Mohamed Saed SalimDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Asyut, Egypt.
Ahmed AymanDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Asyut, Egypt.
Hamdy Z ZidanDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Asyut, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of low-grade gliomas (LGGs) in FLAIR MRI remains challenging due to low-contrast tumor boundaries, irregular morphology, and extreme class imbalance. This work presents a lightweight hybrid segmentation framework that integrates three complementary components: (1) a fast graph-based region refinement step using GrabCut applied during training only to enhance tumor-background contrast, (2) a compact U-Net architecture whose filter configuration is automatically selected using a small-scale genetic algorithm, and (3) an analytical evaluation of lightweight post-processing strategies studied separately from the final GA-optimized model. The method was evaluated on the LGG-MRI-Segmentation dataset using strict patient-level splits of 79 training, 19 validation, and 12 testing patients. The final model achieved strong slice-wise performance with a mean Dice of 0.9132 and a median Dice of 0.9855; the lower mean reflects the influence of more difficult, lower-performing slices and therefore provides a more conservative summary of overall performance across the evaluated test cases. Additional metrics include an IoU of 0.8851, sensitivity of 0.8954, precision of 0.9523, specificity of 0.9997, and an HD95 of 1.00 mm, indicating highly accurate boundary delineation. For contextual benchmarking, a 2D nnU-Net model was trained on the same dataset. nnU-Net achieved a mean validation Dice of 0.8450 and a best validation EMA Dice of 0.9134. Because these nnU-Net Dice values were obtained from its validation workflow rather than the exact slice-wise test procedure used for the proposed model, they are presented as contextual reference results rather than strictly matched test-set estimates. The proposed framework required substantially less training time under the evaluated implementations. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that a carefully coordinated combination of preprocessing, lightweight architectural optimization, and efficient post-processing can achieve strong segmentation performance on the evaluated dataset while remaining computationally efficient. These findings suggest that the proposed framework is promising for computationally constrained LGG segmentation workflows. However, broader clinical applicability requires validation on independent external cohorts before generalizability can be established.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsGenetic AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42873795
PMCPMC13667769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.