Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873784›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Convergent genome streamlining accompanies independent miniaturization in the world's smallest fishes.

Hiranya Sudasinghe, Michael Matschiner, Ralf Britz, Kevin W Conway, Heok Hui Tan, Walter Salzburger, Catherine L Peichel, Lukas Rüber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Convergent genome streamlining accompanies independent miniaturization in the world's smallest fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hiranya SudasingheNatural History Museum Bern, Bern 3005, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0994-3462
Michael MatschinerFaculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Planegg 82152, Germany.
Ralf BritzSenckenberg Natural History Collections, Dresden 01109, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0126-4660
Kevin W ConwayDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology and Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-8385
Heok Hui TanLee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117377, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2227-8866
Walter SalzburgerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9988-1674
Catherine L PeichelDivision of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-8944
Lukas RüberNatural History Museum Bern, Bern 3005, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0125-008X

Funding

Basler Stiftung fuer Biologische Forschung naSwiss NSF 310030_185120TAMU HATCH TEX09452-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniaturization, the reduction of adult body size to an extreme degree, has evolved repeatedly across vertebrates. Yet its genomic underpinnings remain poorly understood. Cypriniformes, the most species-rich order of freshwater fishes, contains multiple miniaturized lineages that have evolved via contrasting developmental processes. Proportioned dwarfs are tiny-bodied but otherwise morphologically similar to larger relatives, while progenetic miniatures exhibit developmental truncation and retain larval-like anatomical features into adulthood. Using a new time-calibrated phylogeny of 309 cypriniform species and comparative genomic analyses of 33 high-quality genome assemblies, we investigated the evolutionary history and genomic correlates of miniaturization across this order. Ancestral state reconstruction revealed multiple independent origins of both miniature types, with reversals to the nonminiature state rarely recovered and miniature origins nonrandomly distributed across the phylogeny. The origins of the two types of miniatures differed in their timing. Progenetic miniatures arose predominantly in the Eocene whereas proportioned dwarfs arose mainly within the Miocene period. Genome size variation across Cypriniformes has been overwhelmingly driven by polyploidy. However, progenetic miniatures showed a directionally consistent, though nonsignificant, trend toward genome size reduction. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that all three independently evolved progenetic miniature lineages share convergent signatures of repeat loss alongside genome-wide intron shortening, patterns absent in proportioned dwarfs. Our study provides the broadest evidence to date that progenetic miniaturization, despite independent origins, is underpinned by predictable structural genomic changes, revealing a fundamental link between developmental truncation and genome architecture in vertebrates.

Indexed as

Body SizeCypriniformesGenomeAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenome SizeGenomicsMiniaturizationPhylogenybody sizecomparative genomicsCypriniformesmacroevolutionminiaturization

Identifiers

PMID42873784
PMCPMC13684242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.