ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Disrupted fear regulation in insomnia disorder revealed by arousal estimation from skin conductance.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insomnia disorder (ID) is a common sleep-wake disorder marked by persistent dissatisfaction with sleep quality or quantity. Previous studies have shown that sleep plays a critical role in emotion regulation, particularly in fear extinction. This study aims to characterize ID using estimates of the sympathetic arousal state derived from skin conductance (SC)-based observations, and to compare two observation models: the marked point process (MPP) model and the MPP coupled with continuous (MPP+Cont) model. We utilize SC data from a fear conditioning and extinction procedure involving 24 individuals with ID and 24 good sleepers (GS). The SC measurements are deconvolved to extract autonomic nervous system (ANS) activations and the tonic component. The MPP observation model uses only the extracted ANS activations, while the MPP+Cont model incorporates both ANS activations and the tonic component. Both models are employed to estimate the underlying arousal state over time and compute a high arousal index (HAI). We compare the estimated arousal states and HAI between the ID and GS groups to assess alterations in arousal associated with ID. Our results reveal that ID may be associated with impaired fear extinction learning and recall. Notably, the distinction between ID and GS emerges only under the MPP+Cont model, indicating the critical role of the tonic component in arousal estimation. Overall, this study highlights the potential of arousal state estimation for understanding autonomic dysregulation in ID, thereby supporting interventions for fear-centered comorbidities and improving quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.