Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873771›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Feasibility, acceptability and usability of InControl web-platform intervention for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A mixed-methods pilot study protocol.

David Oliveira, Nelson P Rocha, Anabela G Silva

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07774416 (Feasibility, Acceptability And Usability Of The InControl Web Platform - A Mixed-methods Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07774416 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Feasibility, Acceptability And Usability Of The InControl Web Platform - A Mixed-methods Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAveiro UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsChronic Musculoskeletal PainArmsInControl intervention, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David OliveiraSchool of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6650-4748
Nelson P RochaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3801-7249
Anabela G SilvaRISE-HEALTH, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic musculoskeletal pain is highly prevalent among older adults and is associated with disability, reduced physical activity, and decreased quality of life. Digital health interventions can improve access to care and support pain self-management. InControl is a user-centered web-based platform that combines exercise and pain science education. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the usability and acceptability of the InControl platform and the feasibility of the research methods. This will help inform methodological improvements in the design of a future randomized controlled trial.

methodsA randomized, parallel-group, mixed-methods pilot study will be conducted with two groups: usual care group and the InControl intervention. Thirty-four participants aged 60 years or older with chronic musculoskeletal pain will be recruited at the Local Health Unit of Aveiro Region. The InControl intervention will last 8 weeks and will combine in-person sessions with remote interventions. Feasibility will be assessed using indicators of recruitment, retention, adherence, refusal, and dropout rates. Usability will be measured using the System Usability Scale, while acceptability and appropriateness will be assessed through a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes will include pain, physical function, psychological factors, quality of life, and cognitive function. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. DISCUSSION: The findings will inform the design of a future large-scale randomized controlled trial and contribute to the development of more effective digital interventions tailored to the needs of older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

trial registrationThis study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT07774416 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07774416?tab=study), August 18, 2026.

Indexed as

Chronic PainInternet-Based InterventionMusculoskeletal PainAgedDigital HealthFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42873771
PMCPMC13667814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.