Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873764›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Investigating the transfer of physical stimuli to the dreamed body: A comparative study of muscular, vestibular, and haptic stimulation on dream incorporation.

Emma Peters, Jakob Poehlmann, Xinlin Wang, Kathrin Fischer, Stefano Maraschin, Gian Jäger, Gabriel Bolliger, Ralf Kredel, Simon Maurer, Martin Dresler and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma PetersInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-0365
Jakob PoehlmannSchool of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Winterthur, Switzerland.
Xinlin WangInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Kathrin FischerInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefano MaraschinDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Gian JägerInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gabriel BolligerInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ralf KredelInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-8132
Simon MaurerTechnology Platform for Research, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin DreslerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Daniel ErlacherInstitute of Sports Science (ISPW), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the dreamed body and the physical body remains an open question in sleep and dream research. This study examined whether somatosensory stimulation applied during REM sleep modulates the corresponding dream content under controlled conditions. Using a within-subject design, we compared three stimulation modalities-electrical muscular, galvanic vestibular, and haptic vibration-each paired with a modality-specific sham stimulation. Twenty-four participants completed one adaptation night followed by three consecutive experimental nights in the sleep laboratory. Dream reports were collected following rapid eye movement sleep awakenings after stimulation or sham periods, yielding a total of 120 reports. Dream incorporation of bodily sensations and actions was observed across all conditions; however, generalized linear mixed-effects analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between stimulation and sham conditions for any modality. No evidence for reliable modality-specific dream incorporation was observed under rigorous sham-controlled conditions. Rather than demonstrating robust stimulation-specific effects, these findings suggest that contextual and expectancy-related influences substantially contribute to bodily dream content under laboratory conditions while highlighting methodological challenges in dream incorporation research. By combining multiple somatosensory stimulation modalities with rigorous sham-controlled procedures, the present study provides a methodological benchmark for future investigations of dream incorporation and dream engineering.

Indexed as

DreamsVestibular SystemVestibule, LabyrinthAdultElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMalePhysical StimulationSleep, REMVibrationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42873764
PMCPMC13667795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.