ArticlePloS one2026
Hidden in historical sources: Rediscovering the thorny oyster (Spondylus gaederopus Linnaeus, 1758) in art, archives, and cultural knowledge.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thorny oyster (Spondylus gaederopus), a Mediterranean bivalve prised during prehistoric times for its distinctive spiny purple shell, has since been overlooked in cultural and scientific records. Frequently depicted in Early Modern still-life paintings, particularly in Italian works of the seventeenth century, its representations were historically misidentified as scallops or common oysters. This participated in obscuring the visual evidence of occurrence and human use of this species during this period. Here, we adopt an interdisciplinary approach combining art historical analysis, taxonomic verification, archival research, and ethnobiological investigation to reconstruct the cultural and ecological history of S. gaederopus in Italy. We identify the species in 43 paintings dated between 1635 and 1750, predominantly by members of the Neapolitan Recco family, revealing its former abundance in coastal markets. Complementary historical documents, local knowledge, and oral testimonies confirm its culinary and cultural significance across Italy from the Early Modern period to the twentieth and twentieth-first century. Comparative measurements indicate a decline in average shell size since the seventeenth century, consistent with a potential harvesting pressure. Our findings demonstrate that unconventional sources including visual art, archival records, and oral testimonies can provide rich ecological and cultural insights, recovering lost biodiversity references and revealing human-marine interactions over centuries. Integrating such interdisciplinary evidence not only sheds light on the forgotten history of S. gaederopus but also highlights the potential of combining cultural heritage and scientific research to inform contemporary conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.