Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873666›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2026

Longitudinal Validity of the DUNDRUM-1 Triage Security Scale in a Canadian Not Criminally Responsible Cohort: A Retrospective Study of 85 Patients.

Alexandre Hudon, Fanie Chainey, Catherine Degré, Anne-Renée Courtemanche, Marc-André Meunier, Allyson Fortier, Camille Bourque, Loriane Boulé, Vincent Latreille, Sophie Mongeon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexandre HudonDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-0928
Fanie ChaineyDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Catherine DegréDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Anne-Renée CourtemancheDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marc-André MeunierDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Allyson FortierDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Camille BourqueDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Loriane BouléDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Vincent LatreilleDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Sophie MongeonDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Service, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jeanne-Marie AllardDépartement de psychiatrie, Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel, Montréal, Canada.
Stéphanie Borduas PagéDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the longitudinal stability of DUNDRUM-1 Triage Security Scale recommendations among individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD) receiving care within a Canadian forensic psychiatric service.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults found NCRMD who received a DUNDRUM-1 assessment at a tertiary academic forensic psychiatric centre in Quebec between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2024. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years and had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Demographic, forensic, and clinical variables were extracted from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes included changes in level of therapeutic security within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included psychiatric rehospitalization and transitions across DUNDRUM security categories. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and exploratory logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsEighty-five individuals met inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly male (91.8%) with a mean age of 39.0 years (SD = 11.9). Schizophrenia spectrum disorders were the most common primary diagnosis (83.5%), while substance-related disorders (74.1%) and personality disorders (49.4%) were frequent comorbidities. Initial DUNDRUM recommendations included low security (56.5%), medium security (35.3%), open settings (4.7%), and maximum security (3.5%). Overall, 72 participants (84.7%) remained within their initially recommended level of care over 12 months, while 13 (15.3%) required a change in therapeutic security. Psychiatric rehospitalization occurred in 12 participants (14.1%). Exploratory analyses identified the mean violence-related DUNDRUM score as the only significant predictor of changes in level of care (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.03-8.00,

Indexed as

DUNDRUM-1forensic psychiatrynot criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD)psychiatric rehospitalizationreview boardstructured professional judgmenttherapeutic securityviolence risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42873666
PMCPMC13669238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.