ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2026
Longitudinal Validity of the DUNDRUM-1 Triage Security Scale in a Canadian Not Criminally Responsible Cohort: A Retrospective Study of 85 Patients.
Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the longitudinal stability of DUNDRUM-1 Triage Security Scale recommendations among individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD) receiving care within a Canadian forensic psychiatric service.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults found NCRMD who received a DUNDRUM-1 assessment at a tertiary academic forensic psychiatric centre in Quebec between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2024. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years and had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Demographic, forensic, and clinical variables were extracted from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes included changes in level of therapeutic security within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included psychiatric rehospitalization and transitions across DUNDRUM security categories. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and exploratory logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsEighty-five individuals met inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly male (91.8%) with a mean age of 39.0 years (SD = 11.9). Schizophrenia spectrum disorders were the most common primary diagnosis (83.5%), while substance-related disorders (74.1%) and personality disorders (49.4%) were frequent comorbidities. Initial DUNDRUM recommendations included low security (56.5%), medium security (35.3%), open settings (4.7%), and maximum security (3.5%). Overall, 72 participants (84.7%) remained within their initially recommended level of care over 12 months, while 13 (15.3%) required a change in therapeutic security. Psychiatric rehospitalization occurred in 12 participants (14.1%). Exploratory analyses identified the mean violence-related DUNDRUM score as the only significant predictor of changes in level of care (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.03-8.00,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.