ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Structural Racism and Coalition Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study of Opioid Prevention and Treatment Implementation.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural racism drives inequities in opioid use disorder, overdose, and treatment access. However, less is known about how it shapes coalition-led implementation of opioid prevention and treatment strategies. Using structural racism as a lens, this study examines how community coalition members described the selection and implementation of opioid-related evidence-based practices intended to reach racial and ethnic minoritized communities. This qualitative study used interview data from 355 coalition members involved in the HEALing Communities Study, a community-engaged, wait-listed, cluster-randomized implementation trial across four states. Interviews focused on coalition context and implementation of evidence-based practices. This secondary analysis examined a subset of data from Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio related to race, racism, coalition context, and intervention implementation. Analysis involved a thematic approach, drawing on PRISM/RE-AIM-informed code reports and emergent coding to identify patterns related to structural racism and implementation. Structural racism was applied as an interpretive lens. Three key themes emerged: (1) Culture over Structures, in which participants often explained inequities through community culture, mistrust, or individual attitudes rather than structural racism; (2) White Residential Homogeneity, in which local racial demographics were used to justify limited race-conscious action; (3) The Burden of Proof, in which missing or difficult-to-use data stalled equity-focused implementation. Some coalitions described strategies to address these barriers, including critical dialogue, inclusive hiring, targeted outreach, and partnerships with community and faith-based organizations. Coalition-led implementation may both mitigate and reproduce racial inequities. Policies and practices that support race-conscious, community-led implementation, equitable data systems, and diverse coalition leadership may strengthen opioid prevention and treatment efforts for racial and ethnic minoritized communities. Future research should examine how these dynamics differ across local contexts, including rural and urban communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42873416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.