ArticleEmergency radiology2026
Development and independent regional validation of a dynamic ultrasound appendicitis score for suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective multicenter study.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency. Although CT is highly accurate, radiation exposure is a major concern in children, young adults, and pregnant women. Ultrasound is radiation-free but operator-dependent, and current scores rely on static weights without accounting for important patient-finding interactions.
objectiveTo develop and independently validate a Dynamic Ultrasound Appendicitis Score (Dynamic UAS) with interaction effects to improve risk stratification and potentially avoid unnecessary CT examinations.
methodsA prospective multicenter study collected development (n = 802) and independent regional external validation (n = 262) data. The Dynamic UAS was derived using multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms and internally validated using bootstrapping (1000 resamples).
resultsA web-based calculator was developed. A sensitivity analysis addressed limitations of the reference standard, non-visualized appendix, and missing data. Appendicitis prevalence was 33.3% (development) and 32.8% (validation). The Dynamic UAS performed excellently in diagnosing acute appendicitis (AUC 0.96 and 0.94) and outperformed known scores (AUC 0.81 to 0.91). At the ≥ 6 level, sensitivity was 91.7%/90.7%, and specificity was 97.1%/96.0%. Calibration was good (slope 0.89, Brier 0.098). In non-visualized appendix cases, the AUC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84 to 0.93) in the external validation cohort and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.94) in the development cohort. The model is not very useful for distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis (AUC 0.72).
conclusionsThe Dynamic UAS is a novel, independently validated tool that may reduce unnecessary CT use in radiation-sensitive populations and resource-limited settings. Future studies in different international settings are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42873382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.