Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873381›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026

Ex-vivo right posterior sectionectomy for large-for-size mismatch in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Andrea Della Penna, Steffen Hartleif, Markus Quante, Silvio Nadalin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea Della PennaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Steffen HartleifPaediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Haematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus QuanteDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Silvio NadalinDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Silvio.Nadalin@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLarge-for-size mismatch remains a major challenge in pediatric and small recipient liver transplantation, particularly when full-size deceased-donor grafts are allocated and conventional splitting is not feasible.

methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective analysis of seven pediatric and adolescent recipients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) with ex-vivo right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) between 2018 and 2022. Grafts were considered oversized based on an integrated surgical assessment including graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), recipient abdominal anatomy, graft morphology, and expected graft fit.

resultsMedian GRWR decreased from 4.7% to 2.2%, allowing graft implantation in all cases. Primary abdominal closure was achieved in six recipients, while one required delayed closure for large-for-size syndrome (LFS). No cases of severe LFS with hemodynamic, ventilatory, or graft perfusion compromise were observed. Major complications occurred in three patients, including one biliary complication requiring surgical revision, one primary graft failure requiring retransplantation, and one death unrelated to graft size or transplant surgery. At a median follow-up of 59.5 months among surviving recipients, six of seven patients were alive; five retained their original graft, while one was alive with a functioning second graft after retransplantation.

conclusionEx-vivo RPS appears to be a technically feasible rescue graft reduction strategy in highly selected pediatric recipients when conventional graft reduction techniques are not feasible. Given the limited cohort size and the occurrence of primary graft failure and mortality, its safety and efficacy require further evaluation.

Indexed as

HepatectomyLiver TransplantationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansInfantMaleOrgan SizeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGraft reductionLarge-for-size syndromeLiver transplantationPediatric transplantationSurgical techniques

Identifiers

PMID42873381
PMCPMC13669043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.