ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
Minoxidil and Prostaglandin Analogs for Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia: A Scoping Review.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is common, distressing, and markedly impairs patients' quality of life. Although scalp cooling is the only approved preventive strategy, its effectiveness and accessibility remain limited. Therefore, alternative pharmacologic approaches, such as minoxidil and prostaglandin analogs, have been explored.
methodsThis scoping review aimed to explore the available evidence on minoxidil's efficacy and safety and the potential role of prostaglandin analogs in alopecia. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medical Online, and Ichushi-Web were comprehensively searched from inception to February 2026. Studies evaluating minoxidil in CIA and prostaglandin analogs in any alopecia type were included. Case reports, case series, and non-human studies were excluded.
resultsSeven studies were included. Five studies evaluated minoxidil in CIA, including two randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies on prophylactic and therapeutic use, respectively. Prophylactic topical minoxidil did not markedly prevent CIA but was associated with earlier hair regrowth. In contrast, therapeutic use-particularly of oral minoxidil-improved hair density and treatment response. No serious adverse events were reported, although cardiovascular effects remain a concern with oral formulations. Two randomized controlled trials evaluated prostaglandin analogs in non-chemotherapy-related alopecia and showed markedly improved hair density and regrowth. However, no study directly assessed their efficacy in CIA.
conclusionsMinoxidil may be beneficial for hair regrowth in CIA but shows limited preventive efficacy. Prostaglandin analogs are promising but untested in this setting. Future studies should evaluate their role, particularly in combination with minoxidil, to address the current evidence gap and improve outcomes for patients with CIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.