Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873367›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2026

Research hotspots and emerging trends of 3D printing in bone defects: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science core collection from 2006 to March 2026.

Xiongjie Shen, Wenling Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiongjie ShenDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wenling ZhangDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 18008467697@163.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2023JJ60022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects continue to pose a significant challenge in orthopedic and reconstructive surgery, especially when presenting as large, irregular, infected, or load-bearing lesions. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has opened new avenues for customized bone repair, offering precise anatomical restoration, tunable porous architectures, mechanical support, and biological functionalization. Nevertheless, the global research landscape, intellectual framework, and emerging frontiers of 3D printing applied to bone defects have yet to be systematically characterized.Bibliometric records were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) within the Web of Science Core Collection for publications from January 1, 2006, to March 15, 2026. PubMed was searched separately as a supplementary source to identify relevant clinical trials and randomized controlled trials. Bibliometric and visualization analyses were subsequently performed using VOSviewer, R Software, and CiteSpace. The analyses focused on publication output over time, country and institutional contributions, author productivity, journal impact, keyword evolution, and trends in clinical translation. A total of 7233 relevant publications were identified in this study, revealing a consistent upward trend in annual output. China and the United States were the predominant contributors in this research domain. Leading institutions included Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Sichuan University. Wu, CT emerged as the most prolific author with 62 publications, while Bose, S demonstrated the highest co-citation frequency (1,290 citations). Regarding journals, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology recorded the largest number of publications, and Biomaterials ranked first in co-citation count. Analysis of research hotspots indicated that clinical trials primarily evaluated the efficacy of 3D-printed bone materials for the reconstruction of various bone defects. Meanwhile, basic science investigations focused on artificial intelligence, oxidative stress, antibacterial properties, macrophage polarization, and advanced scaffold functionalization. Over the past two decades, recent research attention has increasingly shifted from scaffold fabrication and material optimization toward intelligent design, immune-related research, antibacterial functionalization, and more application-specific scaffold development. Future efforts should prioritize mechanistic studies, clinically relevant defect models, multicenter trials, and problem-oriented scaffold engineering to facilitate reliable clinical translation.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBone and BonesPrinting, Three-DimensionalHumansTissue Engineering3D printingBibliometricBone defectsCiteSpaceThree-dimensional printingVisualization analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.