Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873359›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Colourimetric LAMP detection of Escherichia coli in bovine milk using a simplified DNA preparation method.

Tewodros Fentahun Jember, Mark Edward Westman, Sameer Dinkar Pant, Seyed Ali Ghorashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tewodros Fentahun JemberFaculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2955-5638
Mark Edward WestmanElizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute (EMAI), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Menangle, NSW 2658, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-1960
Sameer Dinkar PantFaculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-4478
Seyed Ali GhorashiFaculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia. aghorashi@csu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9820-5308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a common cause of bovine mastitis, and rapid detection from milk is important for timely disease management. However, molecular assays such as colourimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) are often limited by laboratory-based DNA extraction. This study evaluated a simplified HotSHOT (HS) DNA preparation method for extracting E. coli DNA from bovine milk and assessed its compatibility with colourimetric LAMP and conventional PCR. Pasteurised bovine milk spiked with E. coli was used for analytical evaluation, and culture‑positive clinical milk samples were tested to assess diagnostic performance. The HS method was compared with five commercial DNA extraction kits and a direct boiling method without centrifugation. Performance was assessed using limit of detection (LOD) expressed as colony-forming units per millilitre. Using the HS method, the LOD was 7.9 × 10⁴ CFU/mL for LAMP and 7.9 × 10³ CFU/mL for PCR. PCR performance of the HS method was comparable to the QIAamp and Norgen commercial kits, while LAMP sensitivity was ten- to a hundred-fold lower than the best kit-based methods. Direct boiling showed markedly reduced sensitivity, with an LOD of 7.9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL. Among 17 culture-confirmed clinical mastitis milk samples positive for E. coli, LAMP detected 15 (88.2%) and PCR detected all 17 (100%). These results show that simplified DNA preparation can support molecular detection of E. coli in bovine milk and provide a practical basis for future development of field-deployable diagnostics in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

ColorimetryDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsMastitis, BovineMilkMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAnimalsCattleFemaleLimit of DetectionPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialColourimetric LAMPDairy cattleDNA preparationEscherichia coliMastitisVeterinary science

Identifiers

PMID42873359
PMCPMC13669024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.