ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Comparison of efficacy and safety between Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling and coiling alone for irregular intracranial aneurysms: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling (SAC) technique offers theoretical advantages for the treatment of irregular intracranial aneurysms (IIAs); however, comparative data with coiling alone remain limited. This study aimed to compare angiographic and clinical outcomes between SAC and coiling alone in patients with IIAs. This single-center retrospective study included patients with IIAs treated between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into the SAC group and the coiling alone group. The primary outcome was the complete occlusion rate at the last angiographic follow-up. A total of 210 aneurysms were included (103 SAC, 107 coiling alone). Significant baseline imbalances were present: the SAC group had wider necks (4.27 ± 1.54 vs. 3.55 ± 1.26 mm, P < 0.001), smaller dome-to-neck ratios (1.29 ± 0.48 vs. 1.77 ± 0.80, P < 0.001), and importantly, a higher proportion of unruptured aneurysms (42.7% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in immediate complete occlusion (84.5% vs. 91.6%, P = 0.111). At the last angiographic follow-up (mean 6-8 months), the SAC group had a higher complete occlusion rate (93.0% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.004) and a lower recurrence rate (5.6% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.012). The incidence of favorable discharge outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) was higher in the SAC group (89.3% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.006), but this difference was not sustained at 1 year (90.3% vs. 85.0%, P = 0.249). Hospitalization costs were higher in the SAC group (20,906vs.20,906vs.18,284, P = 0.008). Asymptomatic cerebral infarction occurred more frequently in the SAC group (16.5% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.043). Neuroform Atlas SAC was associated with higher long-term complete occlusion rates and lower recurrence compared with coiling alone for IIAs, but also with higher costs and more asymptomatic cerebral infarctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42873351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.