ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Cardiac autonomic and hemodynamic responses to two-stage cycling and post-exercise recovery with partial blood flow restriction in young males.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study compared acute cardiovascular and cardiac autonomic responses during graded (two-stage) aerobic cycling and subsequent recovery performed with and without partial blood flow restriction (BFR).
methodsFifteen young males completed two sessions in a crossover design (control vs. bilateral thigh BFR). Each session included rest, 5 min of cycling at 40% maximal power output (Pmax), 5 min at 60% Pmax, and 10 min of recovery; BFR was released immediately at exercise cessation. ECG and arterial blood pressure were recorded. RR interval, mean arterial blood pressure (MBP), HRV (lnRMSSD, lnSDNN, HF, LF, LF/HF), and composite indices of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity (SNS, PNS) were derived from 3-min segments at rest, exercise, and recovery. Heart rate recovery at 30, 60, and 120 s after exercise cessation (HRR30, HRR60, HRR120) was calculated. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA tested condition, time, and interaction.
resultsTime × condition interactions were observed for RR interval (p=0.015) and MBP (p=0.003), indicating altered hemodynamic kinetics under BFR, primarily during recovery. HRV indices showed no time × condition interactions; however, BFR produced lower lnRMSSD, lnSDNN, HF, and PNS and higher SNS than control (all p<0.05), whereas LF and LF/HF were unchanged. HRR30 (p=0.040), HRR60 (p<0.001), and HRR120 (p=0.010) were attenuated under BFR.
conclusionsBFR modifies cardiovascular regulation during two-stage cycling and recovery and induces sustained autonomic shifts toward reduced parasympathetic and increased sympathetic modulation, largely independent of exercise intensity. Altered recovery kinetics following cuff release highlight the importance of careful monitoring during the recovery phase when applying BFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42873347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.