ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2026
Expected value of the Sackin index under biased speciation models.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Models of random phylogenetic trees are important mathematical tools in phylogenetic data analysis; tree balance is a property of phylogenetic trees that helps describe and compare their shapes. Here, we investigate the Sackin index, one of the oldest and most widely used tree balance measures, under a variety of phylogenetic models beyond the standard Yule and Uniform models. The general biased speciation model is a biologically interpretable tree-generating model in which species branch into pairs of descendants according to an intrinsic branching rate, which is then split between the pair of descendants. The proportion of the branching rate of the parent that is assigned to a specific descendant, the split fraction, is a model parameter. Our main result is a formula for the expected value of the Sackin index under the general biased speciation model. Special cases of the general biased speciation model include a case that sets the split fraction to be a constant for each branching event, and two special cases inspired by the Aldous beta-splitting model: a random choice of split fraction is sampled independently at each branching event and drawn from a symmetric beta distribution in the Blum-François beta-splitting model or an asymmetric beta distribution in the Sainudiin-Véber beta-splitting model. As a corollary of our main result, we find formulas for the expected value of the Sackin index under these three cases of the general biased speciation model. We use the formulas to study how the balance of trees depends on the model parameters. Finally, because the Yule model is a special case of the Blum-François beta-splitting model, we find a new proof for the classical result describing the expected value of the Sackin index under the Yule model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.