Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42873312›Full record

ArticleActa diabetologica2026

Gestational diabetes mellitus in Italian diabetes clinics: clinical characteristics, screening practices and management from the amd annals registry.

Andrea Da Porto, Graziano Di Cianni, Torlone Elisabetta, Manicardi Valeria, Suraci Titti, Rocca Alberto, Pisanu Paola, Rossi Maria Chiara, Candido Riccardo, Russo Giuseppina and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea Da PortoSOSD Diabetologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy. andrea.daporto@uniud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-0169
Graziano Di CianniUOC Diabetologia e Malattie del Metabolismo), ASL Toscana Nord Ovest, Livorno, Italy.
Torlone ElisabettaU.O. "Diabete e Nutrizione" del Centro di Ricerca di Medicina Perinatale e della Riproduzione Università di Perugia, Pescara, Italy.
Manicardi ValeriaAMD Foundation, Santa Clara, USA.
Suraci TittiAMD Foundation, Santa Clara, USA.
Rocca AlbertoAMD Foundation, Santa Clara, USA.
Pisanu PaolaSSD Diabetologia -Dipartimento delle Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Rossi Maria ChiaraCenter for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, CORESEARCH Srl , Pescara, Italy.
Candido RiccardoSOC Patologie Diabetiche, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Russo GiuseppinaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Salvatore De CosmoInternal Medicine and Endocrinology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza di San Giovanni Rotondo, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications of pregnancy and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Nationwide real-world data describing characteristics , screening practices, clinical management, and quality of care of women with GDM attending diabetes clinics in Italy are limited.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using data from the AMD Annals Initiative, a well-established large quality-of-care monitoring program. Anonymized clinical data from women with GDM attending participating centers during 2025 were analyzed. Study measures included demographic characteristics, risk factors, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) timing and results, therapeutic management, intermediate outcomes, and available maternal and neonatal outcomes.The analysis was descriptive.

resultsA total of 13,487 women with GDM were included. The mean age was 33.6±5.4 years, and 41.1% were aged ≥35 years. Pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity were reported in 28.1% and 24.9% of women, respectively. Overall, 20.3% of women met criteria for early OGTT screening based on established risk factors; however, only 15.2% of eligible women underwent testing within the recommended 16-18-week gestational window. Standard OGTT screening between 24 and 28 weeks was performed in 51.5% of cases. Women tested at 16-18 weeks showed higher fasting glucose levels but lower post-load glucose values than those screened at 24-28 weeks. Mean HbA1c at diagnosis was 5.2±0.7%, and only 0.9% of women had HbA1c ≥6.5%. Dietary treatment alone was used in 63.9% of women, while 33.1% required insulin therapy and 5.6% received metformin. Among women with available delivery data (n=2,288), mean gestational age at delivery was 38.8±1.4 weeks, with cesarean section and labor induction rates of 30.0% and 33.6%, respectively. Neonatal outcomes were recorded for 1,384 of these women, whereas postpartum glucose assessment was available for only 3.1% of the entire cohort.

conclusionsThis large real-world analysis provides a first nationwide snapshot of the characteristics and quality of care of GDM in Italy. Although management and perinatal outcomes appear broadly consistent with international standards, substantial gaps remain in adherence to recommended screening pathways, particularly the implementation of early OGTT testing in high-risk women. Improving the completeness and standardization of structured data collection, including maternal and neonatal outcomes, will further strengthen the ability of the AMD Annals to monitor and support continuous improvement in GDM care.

Indexed as

Gestational diabetes mellitusItalyPregnancyQuality of careScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.