ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Is it safe-and ethical-to prescribe THC to youth?
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The medical use of cannabis-derived products in children and adolescents has expanded beyond established indications for purified cannabidiol (CBD), with increasing investigation of CBD-rich extracts containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for neuropsychiatric conditions. Although preliminary studies suggest potential symptomatic benefits, the evidence remains limited by small samples, heterogeneous formulations, short follow-up, and insufficient assessment of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Unlike CBD, THC directly activates CB1 receptors as a partial agonist, a pharmacological property underlying both its therapeutic and psychoactive effects. Following oral administration, THC undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism to the psychoactive metabolite 11-hydroxy-THC, with substantial interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics supporting individualized dosing according to clinical response and tolerability. Experimental studies raise concerns regarding THC exposure during neurodevelopment, while observational studies associate frequent, high-potency recreational cannabis use with cognitive impairment, psychosis, and other adverse psychiatric outcomes. These findings cannot be directly extrapolated to regulated medicinal cannabinoid use, which differs substantially in product composition, dosing, administration, therapeutic indication, and clinical monitoring. Nevertheless, long-term neurodevelopmental safety data for medicinal THC exposure in children and adolescents remain limited. These uncertainties must be weighed against the consequences of inadequately treated disease, particularly severe drug-resistant epilepsy. Accordingly, the risk-benefit assessment of THC-containing products should be individualized, considering disease severity, treatment refractoriness, available evidence-based alternatives, therapeutic response, and tolerability. Long-term prospective studies and improved patient-selection strategies are needed to better define the role of THC-containing medicinal products in pediatric populations.
Identifiers
42873220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.