ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine-Learning-Driven Performance Optimization of Nano-Modified Construction Materials: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomaterials improve the fresh-state behavior, mechanical performance, durability, and multifunctionality of construction materials through packing and filling, nucleation, interfacial regulation, crack bridging, transport-barrier effects, and functional responses. These benefits depend on coupled material, processing, matrix, and service variables, making conventional trial-and-error development inefficient. Machine learning (ML) offers a data-driven route for resolving nonlinear composition-processing-structure-property relationships. This review combines a CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) records with a structured qualitative synthesis of ML-assisted studies on zero-dimensional nanoparticles, one-dimensional high-aspect-ratio nanomaterials, two-dimensional layered nanomaterials, functional nanomaterials, carbon dots, and emerging hybrid systems. Annual output increased from four publications in 2012 to 268 in 2025, and ML showed the strongest recent keyword burst (strength = 22.57). Across representative studies, reported test-set coefficients of determination commonly ranged from 0.858 to 0.995, although validation designs and data independence varied markedly. Tree-based ensembles were generally effective for small-to-medium tabular datasets, whereas deep learning was most defensible for images, spectra, and time-series data. Prediction estimates properties for a specified formulation; optimization uses a validated surrogate model to search the formulation or processing space and therefore requires independent experimental verification. Nano-SiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.