ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
Temporal Trends in Janus Kinase Inhibitor (JAKi) Use Across Five European Countries: A DARWIN EU Network Study.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are increasingly used for autoimmune conditions despite existing safety concerns. This study aims to estimate the incidence of new JAKi use over time and characterise users in Europe to support future safety studies.
methodsThe study included individuals from five European data sources within the DARWIN EU network: FinOMOP-HILMO (Finland; primary and secondary care), IPCI (the Netherlands; primary), IQVIA DA Germany (Germany; primary), NLHR (Norway; primary and secondary), VID (Spain; primary and secondary) from 1 January 2017. Annual incidence of JAKi (abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib) was up to 31 December 2023. Patient characteristics and treatment duration were described.
resultsIncidence of JAKi use increased over time, with transient declines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initiators, except for abrocitinib, were predominantly aged 41-60 years. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common indicated condition, except for abrocitinib, for which atopic dermatitis predominated. Median treatment duration was generally less than 1 year. Tofacitinib and baricitinib had the lowest proportions of prior JAKi use, whereas up to 17% and 16% of upadacitinib and filgotinib initiators had received prior treatment with another JAKi. Findings were consistent across data sources, although incidence rates varied according to the healthcare sector captured.
conclusionsIncidence of JAKi use generally increased, with tofacitinib being the most initiated JAKi. Treatment durations were relatively short and switching between JAKi was common. The current study provides an overview of indication distribution and characterises JAKi treatment, while offering a framework for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.