Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42872630›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

Maintaining Quality of Genetic Counseling Services While Maximizing Efficiency: Protocol for the GC-PRO Intervention Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.

Deborah Cragun, Elena R Fisher, Ashley Petersen, Heather A Zierhut

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deborah CragunCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-2857
Elena R FisherDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-1826
Ashley PetersenDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7711-9657
Heather A ZierhutDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-664X

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Genetic Counseling Processes Result in Outcomes (GC-PRO) StudyR01HG011916 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZIERHUT, HEATHER · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002494NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011916NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG011916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid integration of genomic medicine into clinical care has created an unprecedented demand for genetic counseling (GC) services. Attempts to streamline care have involved integration of GC assistants, group counseling sessions, and development of educational technology supplements; meanwhile, improving the efficiency of the core clinical interaction itself remains understudied. This study will evaluate the GC-PRO Intervention, a targeted communication training for genetic counselors designed to optimize visit time by aligning counseling with patient-centered needs and removing processes that do not contribute to positive patient experiences. Using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design across clinical specialties (e.g., prenatal, cancer, cardiology, and general genetics) at two academic health centers, we will recruit approximately 20 genetic counselors and 994 patients. To ensure the intervention and study design are culturally responsive, we are utilizing a community-based participatory research approach with four multicultural community advisory boards. The intervention training focuses on three evidence-based communication skills: Tailoring (assessing and integrating patient needs and values), Streamlining (reducing time spent gathering patient medical and family history information), and Main Messaging (reducing lecturing through increasing conversational exchanges). The primary outcome is visit time, and secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures of empowerment, activation, trust, working alliance, patient-centered communication, and overall satisfaction. Data will be analyzed using linear and generalized mixed-effects models to compare the intervention to standard of care, accounting for calendar time, counselor nesting, and pre-specified patient characteristics to improve precision. We hypothesize that this intervention will significantly reduce average visit time while maintaining or improving session quality, as measured against pre-specified non-inferiority thresholds. With 80% power to detect a 5-min difference in session length, this study aims to provide a scalable framework for efficient GC services without sacrificing the counselor-patient relationship or patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingQuality of Health CareHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicclinical efficiencycommunity‐based participatory researchgenetic counselinggenetic counseling researchhealth communicationpatient‐reported outcomesservice quality

Identifiers

PMID42872630
PMCPMC13662952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.