ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026
PRAME predicting outcome in uveal melanoma.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intra-ocular malignancy in adults and carries a high risk of metastatic disease, affecting approximately 50% of patients despite advances in local tumour control. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) has emerged as a marker for metastatic risk; however, evidence is largely derived from mRNA expression studies rather than routine immunohistochemistry (IHC). This study evaluates PRAME protein expression by IHC in a large UM cohort and examines its association with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. A total of 403 UM cases were included. PRAME IHC was performed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) and/or whole tumour sections and scored as positive based on nuclear staining in >10% of tumour cells. Associations were assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. PRAME positivity was identified in 5% of TMA cases and 40% of whole-section cases. On TMAs, PRAME expression was associated with worse overall survival (median 26 versus 50 months; p = 0.03) but not metastasis-free survival (MFS). In contrast, whole-section PRAME expression was strongly associated with shorter MFS (median 5 versus 20 months; p < 0.001) and worse overall survival (median 13 versus 52 months; p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis including age, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and BAP1 status, whole-section PRAME positivity remained an independent adverse predictor of MFS (hazard ratio = 10.5, p = 0.002). PRAME IHC is a clinically meaningful prognostic biomarker in UM, particularly when assessed on whole tumour sections, where it provides strong independent prognostic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.