Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42872504›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026

PRAME predicting outcome in uveal melanoma.

Sally Owens, Naomi Walsh, Noel Horgan, Patrick Murtagh, Katie Hanratty, Grainne Finegan, Laura Ivers, John Crown, Susan Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sally OwensLife Sciences Institute, School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-4154
Naomi WalshLife Sciences Institute, School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Noel HorganOcular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Research Foundation Royal Victoria Eye & Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Patrick MurtaghOcular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Research Foundation Royal Victoria Eye & Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Katie HanrattyNational Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Dublin, Ireland.
Grainne FineganNational Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Dublin, Ireland.
Laura IversLife Sciences Institute, School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
John CrownDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Susan KennedyLife Sciences Institute, School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Cancer Clinical Research TrustResearch Foundation Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intra-ocular malignancy in adults and carries a high risk of metastatic disease, affecting approximately 50% of patients despite advances in local tumour control. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) has emerged as a marker for metastatic risk; however, evidence is largely derived from mRNA expression studies rather than routine immunohistochemistry (IHC). This study evaluates PRAME protein expression by IHC in a large UM cohort and examines its association with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. A total of 403 UM cases were included. PRAME IHC was performed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) and/or whole tumour sections and scored as positive based on nuclear staining in >10% of tumour cells. Associations were assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. PRAME positivity was identified in 5% of TMA cases and 40% of whole-section cases. On TMAs, PRAME expression was associated with worse overall survival (median 26 versus 50 months; p = 0.03) but not metastasis-free survival (MFS). In contrast, whole-section PRAME expression was strongly associated with shorter MFS (median 5 versus 20 months; p < 0.001) and worse overall survival (median 13 versus 52 months; p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis including age, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and BAP1 status, whole-section PRAME positivity remained an independent adverse predictor of MFS (hazard ratio = 10.5, p = 0.002). PRAME IHC is a clinically meaningful prognostic biomarker in UM, particularly when assessed on whole tumour sections, where it provides strong independent prognostic information.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorMelanomaUveal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorPRAME protein, humanBAP1immunohistochemistrymetastatic riskPRAMEuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID42872504
PMCPMC13662831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.