ArticleFrontiers in science2026
Aging rate indicators and the search for anti-aging drugs.
Article in Frontiers in science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence that drugs, diets, and single-gene mutations can slow aging and extend the healthy lifespan of mammals has begun to convert biogerontology from an observational science into one based on interventions that could provide people with additional years of healthy, productive life. However, the research and development of anti-aging drugs is hampered by the lack of instantaneous and continuous measures of the rate of aging itself. This article presents recent work on anti-aging drugs that are effective in mice, provides evidence for candidate "aging rate indicators" (ARIs), and outlines a roadmap for translating these into clinical research to slow aging in humans. Thus far, 14 agents or combinations have significantly increased the lifespan of mice in studies conducted under the Interventions Testing Program (ITP) of the National Institute on Aging, often when initiated in late adulthood. Recent evidence suggests that many, perhaps all, interventions that slow aging in mice induce common, shared changes in physiological status and molecular pathways. We have proposed 12 such mechanisms as candidate ARIs, i.e., measurable outcomes that reflect a slow-aging state and that could discriminate between normal mice (and perhaps humans) and those exposed to effective anti-aging interventions-thereby accelerating research. Research priorities now include testing the robustness of these ARIs, extending them to include plasma constituents, elucidating the mechanisms through which diverse interventions alter them, uncovering the links between the ARIs and late-life diseases, and extending research to dogs, non-human primates, and humans. The growing recognition of the legitimacy and promise of evidence-based interventions resulting from aging biology should elevate this field to a level of urgency and respect comparable to that of current research on individual age-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.