ArticleIndian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
Innovative Questionnaire for Assessing Occupational Exposure to Airborne Chemical Pollutants: Development and Validation.
Article in Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Industrial workers are often exposed to various chemical agents, making awareness of their exposure crucial for disease prevention and health improvement. Consequently, a low-cost and efficient method in this area would be highly beneficial. Methods and Materials: In the first stage, factors affecting exposure were extracted from scientific sources and be completed by interviewing experts (initial questionnaire). Then, the questionnaire standardization process (validity and reliability evaluation), face validity, content and structure were checked step by step and in necessary cases. In all these steps, some questions were deleted, some changed, and finally 105 questions remained which entered the next stage. Results: In the phase of face validity and quantitative content, respectively, questions with content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI), less than 0.51 and 0.71 (32 questions) were deleted and some questions (19 questions) were corrected. The 115-question questionnaire entered the construct validity phase, and finally 105 questions remained. The result of the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test for the designed questionnaire was equal to 0.805. For Bartlett's sphericity test, the value of 21547 = 6 was obtained with Conclusion: In the present study, a questionnaire was prepared and validated, which collects all information and objective and nonobjective factors affecting the airborne chemical exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.