ReviewRadiologia brasileira
The Sonographic Muscle Injury Classification in Soccer: proposal for an ultrasound-based muscle injury classification.
Review in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To propose a novel ultrasound-based classification system for muscle injuries in soccer players, termed the Sonographic Muscle Injury Classification in Soccer (SOMICS), and to evaluate its association, ordinal consistency, and agreement with the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC). Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study including 51 adolescent male soccer players (11-19 years of age) with suspected acute myotendinous injuries. All athletes underwent ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 24 h after injury. Four experienced radiologists, working independently, reviewed the images. Results: Interobserver agreement was substantial for ultrasound (κ = 0.65) and MRI (κ = 0.70). A strong ordinal correlation was observed between SOMICS and BAMIC categories (ρ = 0.80; Conclusion: The SOMICS demonstrated significant association, ordinal consistency, and substantial agreement with the BAMIC for severity stratification of muscle injuries. Although not intended to replace MRI-based classifications for prognostic decision-making, the SOMICS provides a structured, reproducible ultrasound-based approach that may be useful in clinical settings where MRI is not readily available or as a first-line imaging tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.