ArticleComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2026
Hair cortisol in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with depressive disorders - A secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial and a status update on psychoneuroendocrine markers for clinical practice.
Article in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychoneuroendocrine research has for many years sought diagnostic, prognostic, and intervention-related biomarkers for clinical conditions. Hair cortisol concentrations (HCC) have been considered promising, but findings on their properties as such a biomarker, for instance in depressive disorders, remain mixed. Method: In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the Affect Regulation Training (ART), a structured group intervention targeting emotion regulation skills, was compared with a common-factor-control (CFC) and a waitlist control condition (WLC) in an outpatient sample with depressive disorders (major depressive disorder or dysthymia, Results: Baseline HCC were neither consistently associated with clinical characteristics nor intervention effects. However, in a subsample rigorously controlled for confounding influences ( Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate psychoneuroendocrine changes during a psychotherapeutic intervention in depressive disorders - but only when rigorously controlling for confounding influences, and not accompanied by consistent cross-sectional and predictive results. Building on these and related findings in depressive disorders, we outline the relevance of controlling for confounding influences, as well as key future research avenues to advance psychoneuroendocrinologically informed psychotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.