Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42872160›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026

Associations between community built environment and leisure-time physical activity among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haixin Li, Liping Zhong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haixin LiSchool of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.
Liping ZhongSchool of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate associations between the community built environment and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) among older adults using three-level meta-analysis to account for dependent effect estimates within studies. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus were searched for cross-sectional studies. Built-environment exposures were grouped into nine domains, and LTPA outcomes into leisure-time walking (LTW), neighbourhood leisure-time walking (NLTW), and General LTPA. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were classified as categorical contrast (CAT) or continuous unit (UNIT) effects and pooled separately using three-level random-effects models. Cluster-robust variance estimation with CR2 correction, heterogeneity and prediction intervals, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, publication-bias assessments, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Thirty-four studies contributed 344 CAT and UNIT effect estimates. In primary CAT analyses, more favourable built environments were associated with higher LTW (OR = 1.103, 95% CI 1.022-1.191) and General LTPA (OR = 1.180, 95% CI 1.089-1.278), with both associations remaining significant after CR2 correction. NLTW was not significantly associated with the overall built environment. In UNIT analyses, the positive association with NLTW lost significance after CR2 correction, while no consistent associations were observed for LTW or General LTPA. Prediction intervals for all three CAT models crossed OR = 1, indicating substantial contextual variation. Domain-specific analyses showed relatively consistent positive associations between aesthetics and LTW, parks and green spaces and General LTPA, and destination accessibility and LTW in UNIT analyses. Sensitivity analyses generally supported the LTW and General LTPA CAT findings. Conclusion: More favourable community built environments were associated with higher LTW and General LTPA among older adults, but associations varied by environmental attribute, activity type, and study context. Because the NLTW analyses were based on very few independent study samples, the NLTW findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than as established effects. Because all included studies were cross-sectional and some analyses showed substantial heterogeneity or limited study numbers, the findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. Longitudinal studies and natural experiments with refined exposure assessment are needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261435582, Unique Identifier: CRD420261435582.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentExerciseLeisure ActivitiesNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansWalkingcommunity built environmentleisure-time physical activityleisure-time walkingolder adultssystematic reviewthree-level meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID42872160
PMCPMC13660755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.