ArticleACS ES&T water2026
Advancing Near-Term Water Quality Forecasting with Explainable Machine Learning and Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification.
Article in ACS ES&T water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phytoplankton blooms threaten drinking-water security, yet translating high-frequency monitoring data into timely, reliable, and interpretable forecasts remains challenging. Machine learning (ML) models can improve predictive accuracy but typically require intensive tuning, yield deterministic forecasts without uncertainty, and offer limited model explainability. To address these limitations, we present here an end-to-end framework integrating an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) ML with automated hyperparameter optimization, bootstrap-ensemble uncertainty quantification, and interpretability through SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP), which we applied to forecast phytoplankton in a water-supply reservoir. A 10-member ML ensemble achieved high chlorophyll-a forecast skill and uncertainty quantification, improving continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) by up to 14.6% over the single model, with ensemble CRPS of 1.2 and 2.7 μg/L at 1 and 7 days ahead, respectively. Global SHAP explanations identified initial chlorophyll-a as the primary driver of the forecast 1 day ahead, with thermal stratification and dissolved organic matter gaining prominence at 7 days. Local SHAP attribution showed individual events to be physically interpretable, each traceable to the dynamic influence of thermal stratification, meteorological forcing, and initial chlorophyll-a. This lightweight transferable framework advances mechanistic understanding of phytoplankton dynamics and supports proactive, risk-informed water-quality management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.