ReviewBurns & trauma2026
Hydrogel microneedles for chronic wound microenvironment remodeling: from drug delivery to intelligent treatment.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The considerable strain that chronic wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers and pressure sores, place on healthcare systems worldwide is largely attributable to the intricate pathological microenvironment characteristic of these conditions, and conventional therapeutic approaches frequently fall short of desired outcomes, primarily because they cannot effectively disrupt biofilm barriers or adequately adapt to the dynamically changing pathological states involved. Hydrogel microneedles (HMNs) have by contrast emerged as a minimally invasive platform whose distinctive structural features and material properties enable both precise transdermal drug administration and active modulation of the wound microenvironment, and this dual capability is why HMNs are currently transforming chronic wound care by shifting the paradigm from passive occlusive dressings toward more proactive and targeted regenerative interventions. This review summarizes recent progress in HMN-based strategies for chronic wound healing and offers perspectives on future developments, beginning with an examination of fundamental design principles such as material choices, structural arrangements, and the various approaches developed to optimize performance metrics, then tracing the evolution of HMNs from simple drug carriers to intelligent multifunctional systems with special attention to their roles in breaking the pathological cycle through antibacterial effects, reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, immune response modulation, and promotion of angiogenesis. Advances in stimuli-responsive systems that utilize endogenous signals including potential of hydrogen, enzymes, ROS, and glucose or external inputs like light and magnetic fields for on-demand release are also covered, as are combination platforms that integrate different therapeutic strategies for additive benefits. Clinical translation faces a number of challenges despite the considerable promise HMNs exhibit in theranostic applications, regenerative medicine integration, and customized fabrication, with obstacles remaining regarding scalable production that ensures consistent quality across batches, long-term biosafety verification, and unclear regulatory pathways; overcoming these hurdles will depend on sustained interdisciplinary efforts that address both scientific understanding and engineering practicality, and without such collaborative work the meaningful incorporation of HMNs into routine clinical management of chronic wounds along with the consequent availability of more effective, accurate, and intelligent treatment options could be difficult to achieve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.