ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Inflammatory Potential of Diet and Breast Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic inflammation may contribute to breast cancer (BC). The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and energy-adjusted DII (E-DII) quantify the inflammatory potential of diet. This case-control study evaluated associations of the DII and E-DII with BC risk among Iranian women. We recruited 600 newly diagnosed BC cases and 600 population-based controls from Isfahan, Iran. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated 168-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). DII and E-DII scores were calculated based on 26 and 25 food parameters, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariable-adjusted models accounted for confounders including age, body mass index, reproductive history, and sunlight exposure. Higher E-DII scores were significantly associated with an increased odds of developing BC. In the fully adjusted models, women in the highest quartile of the E-DII had 63% greater risk than those in the lowest quartile (adjusted OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.08-2.45). Analyses based on continuous E-DII also showed that each unit increase in the E-DII score was linked to a 14% increase in BC odds (adjusted OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.24). In contrast, DII scores were not significantly associated with BC risk in any of the models. This study demonstrated that diets with stronger inflammatory properties, indicated by elevated E-DII scores, are associated with a higher risk of BC among Iranian women. These outcomes underline the value of using energy-normalized inflammatory indices when assessing dietary influences on cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.