Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42872115›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Stemming techniques for resource-poor languages: a review of methods, challenges, and applications.

Sanjiban Sekhar Roy, Mohd Anas, Saravanakumar Kandasamy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanjiban Sekhar RoySchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mohd AnasSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saravanakumar KandasamySchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of stemming is a fundamental part of pre-processing in NLP systems in resource-poor and morphologically complex languages in which linguistic data and annotated corpora are limited. This survey presents a a systematic review of stemming techniques across Afro-Asiatic, Indo-Aryan, Turkic, and Uralic language families, with explicit acknowledgment of coverage limitation and it covers rule-based, statistical, unsupervised, hybrid, and emerging neural-assisted approaches. The evolution of stemming is analyzed in the broader context of NLP paradigms, from early suffix-stripping algorithms to modern sub-word-aware and transformer-influenced models. Special emphasis has been given on resource-poor languages such as Arabic, Urdu, Bengali, Assamese, and other low-resource Indo-Aryan, Afro-Asiatic, and agglutinative languages. For these languages performing explicit stemming remains a critical task despite advances in deep learning. This study further reviews application-driven impacts of stemming in information retrieval, text classification, sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and semantic similarity estimation. A unified comparison framework is presented which has incorporated benchmark datasets, shared-task resources, and multi-dimensional evaluation metrics, including precision, recall, F-measure, MAP, NMI, and stemming-specific error indices. Using careful comparative evaluation, this study points out the strengths and weaknesses of current approaches and provides insights into potential areas for future investigation and developments in language-sensitive stemming systems.

Indexed as

deep learningmorphologically rich languagesnatural language processingresource-poor languagesstemming techniques

Identifiers

PMID42872115
PMCPMC13660024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.