ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Exploring the Relationship Between Femoral Neck Torsion Angle and Anteversion Angle Through Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in a Fixed Coordinate System.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The femoral neck torsion angle (FNTA), an important parameter for assessing femoral neck morphology, has long been underappreciated in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the relationship between FNTA and femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA) through a 3D reconstruction in a fixed coordinate system (3D-R-FCS). Methods: Fifty synthetic Sawbone femoral specimens were analyzed. A 3D-R-FCS was established using superimposing consecutive axial cross-sections after CT scanning and 3D reconstruction. Two independent evaluators measured FNAA via Reikeras, Murphy methods and 3D-R-FCS, and evaluated FNTA via 3D-R-FCS. Results: The FNAA measured by 3D-R-FCS significantly differed from those assessed by Reikeras and Murphy methods (p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 3D-R-FCS exceeded 0.96, markedly higher than those of the Reikeras (ICC = 0.72-0.73) and Murphy methods (ICC = 0.76-0.82). A strong positive correlation was found between the FNTA and the FNAA discrepancy values measured by the two 2D methods (r > 0.95, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The 3D-R-FCS provides a highly reproducible model for quantifying femoral neck anatomy. The study finds out a poor correlation between FNTA and FNAA under 3D-R-FCS, and a positive correlation between FNTA measured by 3D-R-FCS and the FNAA discrepancy values measured by the two 2D methods. The correlation analysis suggests that traditional 2D measurement errors primarily might result from the intrinsic 3D spatial configuration of the femoral neck. However, these results need further explorations and validations in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.