Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42872073›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T water2026

Global Harmonization of Life Cycle Assessments for Small- and Medium-Scale Wastewater Treatment.

Emilio Solis, Nils Thonemann, Ranran Wang, Arnold Tukker, Valerio Barbarossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emilio SolisLeiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden 2333 CC, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7372-291X
Nils ThonemannLeiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden 2333 CC, the Netherlands.
Ranran WangLeiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden 2333 CC, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-3179
Arnold TukkerLeiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden 2333 CC, the Netherlands.
Valerio BarbarossaLeiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden 2333 CC, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-6968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater management (WWM) is vital for protecting human health and the environment, yet conventional centralized systems are resource-intensive and unsuited to growing urban pressure. Small and medium WWMs offer a potentially more sustainable alternative, but the lack of standardized life cycle assessment (LCA) approaches limits robust comparison and informed decision-making. In this study, we conduct a global harmonization of life cycle assessments of small- and medium-scale systems across 96 LCAs and 9 treatment technologies. By harmonizing life cycle inventories, we eliminate variability in methods, assumptions, and biases, thereby providing a consistent setting to compare environmental impacts. The harmonization process shows that GHG emissions have been underrepresented in inventories. The results suggest that direct emissions to air are a key contributor to climate change, and decarbonization strategies should focus on minimizing these emissions. Sequencing batch reactors showed the lowest average phosphorus and low nitrogen emissions to water with minimal chemical dosing and low direct GHG emissions to air. Our findings support the development of environmentally sustainable small- and medium-scale water-treatment solutions for municipal settings.

Indexed as

eutrophicationgreenhouse gas emissionsharmonizationlife cycle assessmentmedium scalewastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID42872073
PMCPMC13660387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.