Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42872006›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

A mixed-methods study of community dog management and rabies awareness in Thailand.

Weerakorn Thichumpa, Anuwat Wiratsudakul, Wirichada Pan-Ngum, Thomas Rawson, Katharina D Hauck, Tini Garske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weerakorn ThichumpaMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anuwat WiratsudakulDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, and the Monitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Wirichada Pan-NgumMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thomas RawsonLeverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katharina D HauckMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tini GarskeMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies elimination requires coordinated interventions across the human-animal-environment interface, yet sustained progress is often hindered by systemic gaps between dog population management, community engagement, and governance. This study investigated community perceptions and challenges related to rabies prevention and control across high-endemic areas in Thailand. Using a mixed-methods design, secondary provincial quantitative data were integrated with qualitative thematic analysis from 57 stakeholders in high endemic areas, including public health officials, policymakers, NGOs, animal-welfare liaisons, and community members. The findings indicated standard rabies awareness, 98.2% of participants demonstrated good preventive practices, recognized post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) as essential, and 68.4% possessed good knowledge. Although most supported dog sterilization (59.6%) and vaccination (63.2%), only 19.3% perceived existing control campaigns as effective. Main challenges included constrained operational resources (57.9%) and limited local government budgets (40.4%). Free-roaming community dogs were prevalent, with 54.4% of participants identifying abandonment as the primary driver of population growth. Informal feeding networks provided localized care for community dogs. While public willingness to fund management was relatively low (33.3% willing to pay; 19.3% supporting co-payment), reflecting an expectation of local authority responsibility. Qualitatively, unclear boundaries between public health mandates and animal welfare legal frameworks added complexity to rabies outbreak response and sometimes introduced institutional challenges among local government and non-governmental sectors. Nevertheless, stakeholders strongly supported sustained sterilization and intersectoral collaboration. Addressing policy-practice gaps, stabilizing financing, and integrating community social dynamics into formal One Health governance are crucial for achieving sustainable rabies elimination.

Indexed as

Community dogsMixed methodsOne healthRabiesSterilizationVaccine

Identifiers

PMID42872006
PMCPMC13659610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.