Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871975›Full record

ArticleZoological studies2026

Romain Sabroux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Romain SabrouxBiology and Evolution of Marine Organisms (BEOM), Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy. E-mail: romain.sabroux@szn.it (Sabroux).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The taxonomic classification of sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) includes 11 distinct families, mostly characterized by different combinations of presence/absence of the cephalic appendages, the characters they display (number of articles, terminal claw, distribution of spines, etc.), and the position of gonopores in both sexes and of the cement gland pores in males. However, about 20 nominal species could not be confidently classified, and a few others were only tentatively assigned to one of these families. These taxa represent an interesting challenge to review, reshape and expand the Pycnogonida taxonomy, and thus to apprehend more comprehensively the phylogeny of the group. In this contribution,

Indexed as

Coral SeaDiagnostic charactersPacific OceanPantopodaSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID42871975
PMCPMC13659617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.