ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Extrauterine adenomyoma of the liver: A case report with a review of the literature.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extrauterine adenomyoma is an exceedingly rare benign lesion composed of endometrial glands/stroma embedded within smooth muscle bundles and located outside the uterus. The majority of extrauterine adenomyomas occur in the pelvis involving the ovary, rectovaginal space, or broad ligament; hepatic involvement is extremely rare. We present the case of a 47-year-old woman with a subcapsular mass in segment VI of the liver that was detected during the work-up for abdominal pain. Initial core needle biopsy of the mass was suggestive of FNH or hepatic adenoma, with expert consultation favoring parasitic leiomyoma. Finally, the patient underwent surgical resection, and the histopathological exam revealed endometrial glands and stroma, admixed with smooth muscle, confirming the diagnosis of extrauterine adenomyoma. This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of extrauterine adenomyoma and emphasizes the importance of considering this entity in the differential diagnosis of pelvic or extrapelvic masses, particularly in women with a history of gynecologic lesions. Recognizing this rare condition may help prevent misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.