ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Feasibility and placement accuracy of a sensor-guided intraosseous device with an automated stop in a small-bone rat cadaver model: a single-arm pilot study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid intraosseous (IO) access is critical in emergency care when venous access is not feasible. IO access is particularly prone to error in small animals and human neonates with narrow medullary cavities. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and placement accuracy of a novel sensor-guided IO drilling device with an automatic stop mechanism in a rat cadaver model. Methods: Seven thawed Sprague-Dawley rat cadavers underwent 14 tibial insertions by a single experienced operator using a standardised protocol. Placement was assessed by computed tomography (CT), with successful insertion defined as intramedullary positioning of the needle tip. Two blinded readers independently classified each insertion. The principal outcome was the proportion of successful placements; a prespecified device-evaluable analysis excluding user-related targeting errors was exploratory Results: Nine of 14 insertions were correctly positioned, yielding a success rate of 64.3% (9/14; 95% CI 35.1-87.2%). In the device-evaluable analysis, success was 81.8% (9/11; 95% CI 48.2-97.7%). Three lateral displacements and two overpenetrations occurred. Reader agreement was complete ( Conclusion: In this small-bone cadaver model, the automated-stop intraosseous device achieved CT-verified intramedullary placement in most attempts and functioned as intended. As this single-arm pilot lacked a comparator and CT assessed needle-tip position rather than functional access, the findings are limited to placement accuracy and are hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.