Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871888›Full record

ArticleGeneral psychiatry2026

Antidepressant use and Parkinson's disease risk: Overall protective effect with drug-specific variation.

Ancha Baranova, Hongbao Cao, Chenxin Xu, Wenxi Sun, Dongming Liu, Fuquan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ancha BaranovaSchool of Systems Biology George Mason University Manassas Virginia USA.
Hongbao CaoSchool of Systems Biology George Mason University Manassas Virginia USA.
Chenxin XuDepartment of Colorectal Medical Oncology Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Wenxi SunSuzhou Guangji Hospital Suzhou Jiangsu China.
Dongming LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-8191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antidepressants can cause extrapyramidal side effects, but their impact on Parkinson's disease (PD) risk remains unclear. Aims: We aimed to investigate the association between genetic liability to antidepressant use and PD. Methods: We examined the causal effect of antidepressant use on PD using Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis. We further performed multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis to determine the independent effect of genetic liability to antidepressant use on PD by accounting for the effect of major depressive disorder (MDD) on PD. The United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2004 Q1-2024 Q2, 53.4 million event-level records) was mined to assess associations between 13 antidepressants and PD. Colocalisation analyses identified shared genetic variants between genetic liability to antidepressant use and PD. Results: MR analyses demonstrated that genetic liability to antidepressant use was inversely associated with PD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74, Conclusions: Genetic and observational evidence together support an inverse association between antidepressant use and PD. Given varying individual drug profiles, agents such as duloxetine warrant further prospective evaluation.

Indexed as

depressive disorderneurocognitive disorders

Identifiers

PMID42871888
PMCPMC13659639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.