Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871883›Full record

ReviewPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Deep learning-based metal artifact reduction in CT for head and neck radiotherapy.

Ehsan Mihandoust, Peyman Sheikhzadeh, Saeedeh Navaei Lavasani, Hossein Arabi, Davoud Ahmadvand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ehsan MihandoustDepartment of Medical Imaging Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Peyman SheikhzadehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IKHC, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeedeh Navaei LavasaniDepartment of Medical Imaging Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Davoud AhmadvandDepartment of Medical Imaging Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Metal artifacts from dental fillings and implants compromise CT image quality, target delineation, and dose calculation accuracy in head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy. Previous reviews have largely focused on traditional metal artifact reduction methods and image quality metrics rather than radiotherapy-specific endpoints. This systematic review evaluates deep learning-based metal artifact reduction (DL-MAR) approaches for H&N radiotherapy, emphasizing technical advances and clinical dosimetric validation. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus were systematically searched (updated April 2026) for studies assessing DL-MAR methods in H&N CT imaging and radiotherapy. Of 227 identified records, 40 studies (11 traditional MAR and 29 DL-MAR studies) met the inclusion criteria. Results: Reported DL architectures included convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, dual-domain networks, diffusion models, and task-oriented loss functions. Among studies with clinical dosimetric validation, GAN-based and task-oriented approaches consistently reported dose deviations below 3%. Gamma pass rates exceeding 95% (3%/3 mm) were reported in a subset of these studies. Dual-domain and diffusion-based methods were evaluated primarily using image quality metrics without direct radiotherapy-specific dosimetric validation. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that DL-MAR may achieve clinically acceptable dosimetric accuracy while improving artifact suppression and target visualization in H&N radiotherapy planning. Task-oriented loss functions currently demonstrate promising potential for clinical translation based on available retrospective evidence. Broader clinical implementation remains limited by reliance on synthetic training data, restricted access to sinogram data, and the absence of prospective multicenter validation studies.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyDeep learningDosimetric validationHead and neck radiotherapyMetal artifact reductionPatient-specific quality assurance

Identifiers

PMID42871883
PMCPMC13660643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.