ArticleBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026
How to use social media to amplify your professional impact in respiratory medicine.
Article in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media has become an integral component of modern medical practice, with most healthcare professionals engaging with it in some capacity. Its use has been associated with enhanced knowledge dissemination, professional networking, and increased visibility of research and clinical expertise. For respiratory healthcare professionals, social media offers particular value in navigating rapidly evolving evidence, technological innovation, establishing international collaborations and ongoing public health challenges. This article summarises current evidence and provides practical guidance on how to use social media to amplify professional impact in respiratory medicine, both in a professional context and in clinical practice with patients. We discuss key definitions, opportunities and limitations, with a focus on responsible and effective use to support collaboration, education and patient engagement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.