ReviewMedComm2026
Neuropathic Pain: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Interventions.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropathic pain is caused by injury or disease of the somatosensory system. It involves peripheral nerve injury, central sensitization, transmitter imbalance, glial activation, and large-scale network remodeling. Despite substantial advances in pain biology, clinical assessment continues to rely predominantly on patient-reported symptoms, sensory examination, and conventional neurophysiological testing, approaches that often fail to delineate the predominant biological mechanisms underlying pain in individual patients. Recent advances in sensory phenotyping and multimodal imaging have enabled in vivo characterization of abnormalities at the receptor, neuroinflammatory, and circuit levels, thereby providing a foundation for mechanism-based stratification and more individualized therapeutic decision-making. This review summarizes neuropathic pain from clinical stratification to mechanism-based imaging and therapeutic intervention. We describe key clinical dimensions, including sensory gain, sensory loss, peripheral and central pain generators, mixed nociceptive-neuropathic pain, central sensitization, and autonomic or small-fiber modifiers. These dimensions help explain why patients with the same diagnosis may show different symptoms and treatment responses. We also review major molecular mechanisms, including glutamatergic overactivity, GABAergic and glycinergic disinhibition, monoaminergic remodeling, and neuroimmune modulation. These changes reshape spinal, thalamocortical, limbic, salience, reward, cerebellar, and descending control circuits. Peripheral nerve ultrasound and MR neurography can help identify structural peripheral pain generators. PET, MRS, MRI, DTI, fMRI, EEG, and multimodal imaging can assess receptor availability, neurotransmitter balance, neuroinflammation, white matter integrity, and network connectivity. These imaging tools may link clinical phenotypes with biological mechanisms and help define mechanism-based subtypes. Imaging biomarkers may also support treatment selection, treatment monitoring, neuromodulation targeting, and translational trial design. This framework supports a shift from symptom-based assessment to mechanism-guided precision care for neuropathic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.